<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CVS and Family Dollar Stores Inc. Sued for Impressions of Perfume</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to exploring the world of perfumes, scents and fragrances.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kady</title>
		<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/comment-page-1/#comment-30556</link>
		<dc:creator>Kady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/#comment-30556</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with buying knock-offs. In the middle of a recession we need to find ways to save money and, why not? splurge on other things. Fragance in my opinion should be a save for most of us. I mean we should all have that one expensive perfume for special occasions, but we should give knock-offs a try for not so special occasions. Plus, most of us normal girls have more important expenses than fragances(school, car, mortgage, insurance, and much more). This is just the point of view of a regular college girl with a part time job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with buying knock-offs. In the middle of a recession we need to find ways to save money and, why not? splurge on other things. Fragance in my opinion should be a save for most of us. I mean we should all have that one expensive perfume for special occasions, but we should give knock-offs a try for not so special occasions. Plus, most of us normal girls have more important expenses than fragances(school, car, mortgage, insurance, and much more). This is just the point of view of a regular college girl with a part time job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/comment-page-1/#comment-26663</link>
		<dc:creator>mike higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 07:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/#comment-26663</guid>
		<description>does anyone that shops family dollar stores shop saks of neiman marcus where the real ones are sold? does estee really think people are getting these brands &quot;mixed up &quot; with the real ones, if you read the disclaimer on these products it says &quot; if you like &quot;Beautiful&quot; try our brand called UGLY, MEANING IF YOU LIKE STARBUCKS TRY FOLGERS, there both the same item &#039;coffee&#039;just try ours you may like it, it&#039;s called &#039;COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING&quot;  thats all! no one says &quot; this is the same as Estee but cheaper, read the fine print people, anyway why should perfume cost $50.00 - $80.00 dollars, as they claim they spend tens of milions advertising, thats the real cost and the fools go out and pay that crap  when you could be paying $5.00</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone that shops family dollar stores shop saks of neiman marcus where the real ones are sold? does estee really think people are getting these brands &#8220;mixed up &#8221; with the real ones, if you read the disclaimer on these products it says &#8221; if you like &#8220;Beautiful&#8221; try our brand called UGLY, MEANING IF YOU LIKE STARBUCKS TRY FOLGERS, there both the same item &#8216;coffee&#8217;just try ours you may like it, it&#8217;s called &#8216;COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING&#8221;  thats all! no one says &#8221; this is the same as Estee but cheaper, read the fine print people, anyway why should perfume cost $50.00 &#8211; $80.00 dollars, as they claim they spend tens of milions advertising, thats the real cost and the fools go out and pay that crap  when you could be paying $5.00</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tink</title>
		<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I recall seeing these and few smelled close to real thing.

They will probably just change the names to something similar but not the actual trademark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall seeing these and few smelled close to real thing.</p>
<p>They will probably just change the names to something similar but not the actual trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not fair play anymore to use a designer name on a non-designer product.  They should really just use another name as lawsuits are heating up regarding copyright infringement.  

I guess there is a lot of money to be lost for a company when this occurs.  In fact, I saw an artist using the LV logo and handbag in a t-shirt design and they are suing her - and it was for charity to help Darfur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not fair play anymore to use a designer name on a non-designer product.  They should really just use another name as lawsuits are heating up regarding copyright infringement.  </p>
<p>I guess there is a lot of money to be lost for a company when this occurs.  In fact, I saw an artist using the LV logo and handbag in a t-shirt design and they are suing her &#8211; and it was for charity to help Darfur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy (Momisodes)</title>
		<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy (Momisodes)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/#comment-697</guid>
		<description>I agree. I don&#039;t see the big deal with perfume knock-offs.  However, I suppose I can see how their name use could ruffle their feathers a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I don&#8217;t see the big deal with perfume knock-offs.  However, I suppose I can see how their name use could ruffle their feathers a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

