<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Delicious Scent &#187; CVS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deliciousscent.com/tag/cvs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com</link>
	<description>Dedicated to exploring the world of perfumes, scents and fragrances.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CVS and Family Dollar Stores Inc. Sued for Impressions of Perfume</title>
		<link>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perfume News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estee Lauder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Dollar Stores Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preferred Fragrance Inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to my local CVS store recently and saw a bunch of &#8220;Impression&#8221; perfumes. I was rather amused by them because they were basically imitations of pricey perfumes sold in high-end department stores. There were titles such as &#8220;Impression of Happy by Clinique&#8221; and &#8220;Impression of Beautiful by Estee Lauder.&#8221; Although these perfumes were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to my local CVS store recently and saw a bunch of &#8220;Impression&#8221; perfumes. I was rather amused by them because they were basically imitations of pricey perfumes sold in high-end department stores. There were titles such as &#8220;Impression of Happy by Clinique&#8221; and &#8220;Impression of Beautiful by Estee Lauder.&#8221; Although these perfumes were knocks-offs, but at least they were not counterfeit products that claimed to be the real thing.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for CVS Caremark Corp, Family Dollar Stores Inc., and Preferred Fragrance Inc. (who made the knock-offs), Estee Lauder Cosmetic Inc. filed a federal lawsuit against them on Wednesday. Estee Lauder accused CVS and Family Dollar of selling imitation products that used their actual registered trademarks and/or names that were very similar to the original ones.</p>
<p>The suit included accusations of &#8220;trademark infringement, false advertising, diluting their trademarks and unfair competition.&#8221; It seeks for an injunction to stop CVS and Family Dollar from selling the products and asking for damages of up to $1 million for each individual type of knock-offs<span id="more-191"></span>.</p>
<p>While I was in the store, I actually tried one of the &#8220;Impression&#8221; perfumes for fun. In fact, I had tried on an &#8220;Impression of Happy by Clinique.&#8221; Although the scent was somewhat similar, it was very obvious that it was an imitation because it smelled mustier than the real Clinique Happy. However, if people can’t afford the real one, I don’t think it is a huge deal to buy an imitation if one did not mind the scent difference.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I can see why Estee Lauder and Clinique would be worried about the loss of business from the knock-offs. Then again, if a person is buying an imitation due to its lower price tag, they wouldn&#8217;t be buying the real, more expensive version anyway. Not that I am advocating knock-offs, but why not let everyone (who can and cannot afford the authentic product) enjoy the scent as long as it&#8217;s not counterfeit and contain questionable ingredients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deliciousscent.com/2008/06/12/cvs-and-family-dollar-stores-inc-sued-for-impressions-of-perfume/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
